<span class='p-name'>Value, Cognitive Authority, and Digital Badges</span>

Value, Cognitive Authority, and Digital Badges

TL;DR version: Drawing on work from critical evaluation and new literacies theory and research I posit the challenges and design opportunities that arise while considering cognitive authority and where you host your badges when developing your open badge initiative. Warning...what follows is somewhat theoretical...and bit academic. ;)

I’ve been detailing the development of our own open badging initiative here on this blog. Yesterday I had the privilege of speaking on the Mozilla Open Badges Community Call sharing our work to this point…and more importantly the “next questions” that I have. These questions focus on elements of a digital badging infrastructure and possible next steps for education and research involving open badges. The major question that I have had since I’ve started exploring new hosting opportunities for our ORMS badges involves aspects of value, credibility, and “sincerity” of design involved in our badging infrastructure. Put simply, I believe that people will make judgments about the believability, credibility, and relevance of the digital badges based on elements of the metadata, the images used, and where the badge is hosted.

What motivated this thinking?

My thinking on this has been motivated by lessons learned as our badges on badges.mozilla.org were deleted, and then the subsequent dialogue and communications with members of the badging community. One of the reasons why I initially hosted my badges at badges.mozilla, and my biggest consideration in finding a new place to host the badging system revolves around the thinking and evaluation that will (should) take place as participants view, pledge, and earn our badges. I initially wanted Mozilla to host the badges because they have a certain level of credence or inherent value since they’ve been leading the charge for digital badges. Now that I’m looking for a new home for our badging system, I want to make sure this veneer of authenticity and sincerity of online information is still viewed as credible and reputable as before. In a later blog post I’ll discuss the next steps for where we’ll host our badging system…and more importantly the why associated with this. This blog post is focused on the value and cognitive authority associated with digital badges…or at least how I see it.

What is cognitive authority?

My thinking about credibility, value, critical evaluation, and online information is informed by work conducted in my dissertation. In my dissertation I focused on critical evaluation of online information and how I could scaffold this type of healthy skepticism in adolescents. In the literature review of the critical evaluation research I was struck by this idea of “cognitive authority” and I think it plays a role in how individuals view badging systems. As individuals evaluate and judge information they make decisions about the quality and cognitive authority apparent in the information they’re viewing (Metzger, 2007). The reason I’m saying “apparent” is that in online information sources this veneer of authenticity and sincerity is sometimes murky. Quality is defined as “a user criterion, which has to do with excellence or in some cases truthfulness in labeling” (Taylor, 1986, p. 62). This definition of quality postulates that systems of information, and information itself has specific intrinsic values that are tangible and can be seen (Taylor, 1986), however not all elements of this valuation can be overtly seen. Cognitive authority is the premise that individuals either construct knowledge based on first-hand experiences or from what they have learned from second-hand form others (Wilson, 1983). Cognitive authority can be viewed as a determination made by individuals based on their thoughts about how “proper” the information is that they are learning, or beliefs about the author of the information (Wilson, 1983).

What does this mean for open badge initiatives?

In online spaces this means that individuals consider elements of multimodal information (images, video, audio, and text), markers of credibility and relevance, other websites or information found online…along with prior knowledge about the author or institution to determine “value” and “authority” in what they’re reading, using, or learning. In the world of digital badges I believe these considerations of value and cognitive authority are hugely important. There is still a certain amount of reticence, skepticism, and confusion involved as individuals consider and cognitively “grasp” digital badging systems. Participants (those that earn the badge, and reviewers of these credentials) will evaluate the value of the badge based on the metadata, the image for the badge (how professional/appropriate it is), where the badge is hosted, and what other badges are hosted there.

To me this adds another layer to the complexity associated with launching and hosting an open badge initiative. Put simply, as developers of open badging systems we need to consider how we contextualize our badges. What does the URL, the website design, and the other badges hosted on the site “say” about the badge you’re pledging for? What is the difference between a badge that I host on my WordPress blog…or my university website…or a third-party site like Credly? What value judgments do people pledging or reviewing these credential assign when my badge is on the same website as the “You Mad Bro?” badge? As we develop our own badges we need to consider not only badge design and metadata…but also selection, development, and support of badge infrastructure and communities.


Image CC by wikimedia



Metzger, M. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091. doi:10.1002/asi.20672

Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: AblexPublishing

Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority (p. 15). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Chicago

9 Comments Value, Cognitive Authority, and Digital Badges

  1. Carla Casilli

    Hey Ian,

    Thanks for writing up your thoughts and sharing your blog post here. With this post and your research questions about open badges, you’re helping us to build a better product for everyone. Thank you.

    The questions of authenticity and validity that you raise about the credibility and reputability of available badge issuing authorities provides another lens for the community to use as we endeavor to build a robust ecosystem.


    1. wiobyrne

      Hi Carla,

      As always…thanks for the feedback…and thanks for the guidance. My thoughts would be nothing if not supported by the community, and your guidance. Thanks again.

  2. mozzadrella (@mozzadrella)

    Hi Ian, Vanessa from Peer 2 Peer University here.

    While I think your concerns about validity and authority are solid ones, and design does influence perception, I wonder if you could see it another way…

    P2PU has designed our Badge system to optimize feedback and interactions between peers in reviewing Badges. So, in this system, the Badge matters less than the feedback and evidence behind it. What are your thoughts about cognitive authority and legitimacy in light of prioritizing not the way the Badge looks or the metadata, but the meaty stuff in the interaction around it?

    A sample to give you an idea: http://badges.p2pu.org/en-us/project/44/

    1. wiobyrne

      Hi Vanessa,

      Thanks for the feedback. I definitely agree with you about the value of the definitions & rigor in the metadata. I think in many ways that might be the most important element. In this post I was trying to focus on an element that I learned during my struggles losing/rebuilding my badges…the value of “where” the badge is hosted. I brought it up a couple of times in the Mozilla call…and then afterwards thought to myself…I need to make this a bit more clear for others…and myself.

      Thanks again for the feedback. Quick question…would I be able to host my badges at P2PU?

        1. wiobyrne

          Hi Vanessa,

          Thanks again. In rebuilding our badge system, we might load it into Google Sites…but may just join a community. P2PU is always tops in my book. 🙂

  3. Pingback: Value, Cognitive Authority, and Digital Badges ...

  4. Pingback: Value, Cognitive Authority, and Digital Badges ...

  5. Pingback: Value, Cognitive Authority, and Digital Badges ...

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.